Advertisement

Find answers, ask questions, and connect with our community around the world.

  • Senate probe shows no evidence of Russian collusion in Trump campaign

    Posted by Unknown Member on February 12, 2019 at 9:05 pm

    [link=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/12/nbc_dilanian_senate_probe_finds_no_evidence_of_russian_collusion_in_trump_campaign.html]https://www.realclearpoli…in_trump_campaign.html[/link]
     
    Democrats now: “Help us, Robert Mueller! You’re our only hope!”

    kayla.meyer_144 replied 4 years, 1 month ago 6 Members · 14 Replies
  • 14 Replies
  • btomba_77

    Member
    February 13, 2019 at 4:35 am

    Correction — The Republican leader of the Senate investigation says he sees no sign of collusion.
     
    [link=https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12/politics/warner-burr-senate-russia-collusion-question/index.html]https://www.cnn.com/2019/…on-question/index.html[/link]
     
    but …

     
    [b]Warner splits with Burr on collusion question   [/b]
    [b] [/b]
    “Respectfully, I disagree,” Warner said Tuesday. “I’m not going to get into any conclusions I’ve reached because my basis of this has been that I’m not going to reach any conclusion until we finish the investigation. And we still have a number of the key witnesses to come back.”

    Warner’s comments represented a rare public split for the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which has been the only congressional panel that has kept its investigation into Russia’s 2016 election meddling on a bipartisan track.

        ____
     
    Burr’s comments just represent the last gasp as bipartisanship over Russian interference dies 
     
     
    Burr’s statement is of no more value than saying “Devin Nunes says no evidence of collusion”

    • katiemckee84_223

      Member
      February 13, 2019 at 11:04 am

      As opposed to your 2 years of posting nothing burgers, dergon?
       
      Explain to us what you know that no one else has known, or leaked, over [b]2 years.[/b]
       
      [b]Come on, [/b]a smart guy like you has to be able to use common sense and deductive reasoning to realize what’s going on (hint hint, nothing) — at least after we give you a pass for 2 whole years.
       
      Do you call labral tears because you HOPE they are there? Or do you actually look at the images?

      • kayla.meyer_144

        Member
        February 13, 2019 at 11:34 am

        A lot of people convicted about nothing.

        Besides, we have Clinton years investigation to catch up to. & Clinton was only about a soiled dress not about all the things that have come out in Trumps dirty laundry.

        Be patient, cigar. Its coming.

        • Unknown Member

          Deleted User
          February 13, 2019 at 1:31 pm

          [image]https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/02/cnn-640×480.jpg[/image]

          • kayla.meyer_144

            Member
            February 13, 2019 at 2:08 pm

            Well since you people say collusion with the Russians by the president is not a crime, that cartoon is probably correct. However apparently you dont know Trumps history in New York & New Jersey since the 1980s. But ignorance is no excuse.

            There will be criminal behavior found I am very sure. Trump is as innocent as O.J.

            • Unknown Member

              Deleted User
              February 13, 2019 at 4:14 pm

              [image]https://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Moving-the-goalposts-300×2402.jpg[/image]

              • kaldridgewv2211

                Member
                February 13, 2019 at 4:26 pm

                Senate doesn’t do criminal investigation

                • katiemckee84_223

                  Member
                  February 13, 2019 at 6:55 pm

                  News flash, there’s no such thing as a criminal investigation on the president
                   
                  otherwise Obama would be in the bad kind of bathhouse right now

                  • btomba_77

                    Member
                    February 14, 2019 at 4:32 am

                    Sen. [link=https://thehill.com/people/angus-king]Angus King[/link] (I-Maine): 
                    The Senate Intelligence Committee has not concluded anything.  Several of the individual members have made statements, but I certainly am not prepared to make a statement as to what was found or not found.
                     

                    • yao.bw39_792

                      Member
                      February 14, 2019 at 9:30 am

                      [link=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/02/14/manaforts-court-day-spell-trouble-trump/?utm_term=.12690298494f]https://www.washingtonpos…utm_term=.12690298494f[/link]
                       

                  • kaldridgewv2211

                    Member
                    February 14, 2019 at 2:41 pm

                    Quote from Intermittent Blasting

                    News flash, there’s no such thing as a criminal investigation on the president

                    otherwise Obama would be in the bad kind of bathhouse right now

                    well that doesn’t sound correct.  Not to mentions his minions have been getting pinched by the ongoing special console investigation.  
                     
                    Crutch of a weak argument is when you come full circle to the “but Obama got away with it” or “lock her up”.

  • btomba_77

    Member
    September 2, 2020 at 5:32 am

    [link=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dhs-withheld-july-intelligence-bulletin-calling-russian-attack/story?id=72747130]https://abcnews.go.com/Po…tack/story?id=72747130[/link]
     
    DHS withheld publication of intelligence bulletin warning of Russian scheme to push allegations about the poor mental health of Joe Biden

    • btomba_77

      Member
      September 21, 2020 at 7:43 am

      [b]McMaster Surprised that Trump Denied Russian Interference[/b][/h1]  
       
       
      Former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster told [link=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/h-r-mcmaster-battlegrounds-china-afghanistan-national-security-60-minutes-2020-09-20/]60 Minutes[/link] that he reacted with surprise, disappointment, disbelief when in 2017 President Trump told reporters he believed Vladimir Putin when he denied interfering in the 2016 US election.
       
      McMaster said he and other advisers had a conversation with the president afterwards, we said, Your answer to that question will be misconstrued as a complete denial of Russian meddling when we know its incontrovertible. Its just, its just a fact.

       

      • kayla.meyer_144

        Member
        September 21, 2020 at 8:37 am

        Trump expects to get some further rewards from Putin after he’s out of office.
         
        More Russian money through Deutsche Bank & a Moscow Trump Tower?