Find answers, ask questions, and connect with our community around the world.

  • Unknown Member

    Deleted User
    May 15, 2008 at 5:08 am

    they have kept a “moral” society in the east, but it is one based on a religion, even if it is not Chrisitian, and therefore an “inspired” set of values. that said, women are still second class citizens and not allowed the same opportunities as men.  people are killed for their beliefs everyday, but in this case it is because of a fight against oppression or whatever. so you see, how can men be the dictator of morality when we have no morals really? we will kill and wage war no matter what culture, even the untouched tribes in the australian outback do it. so with this know, what do you do in a “scientific society” based on survival of the fittest? the weaker kids on the play ground would never survive to become scholars or doctors, they would be killed off and the new morality would be that only the strong and beautiful survive. this would be a devolution in modern terms of progression would it not?