[tselvidas_246]

You should add to the ovarian/adnexal section that this applys only to lesions evaluated in 3D.

[AngPat]

Excellent idea!

[jsantamaria_746]

Thanks. I think using this website makes the report look evidence-based and much more professional.  It is a good way doing it until one day AI takes over and inserts all those recommendations automatically into machine-generated report. 

[JAMELLESEABURY_446]

I think this is a great idea. However, you should just have check boxes/radiobuttons with result on same page rather than having to click and wait for next prompt moving from page to page. 

[jsantamaria_746]

It is a good suggestion. I am not sure if the author has the IT expertise to build it that way since this is his very first attempt to build a website.  However, I did notice if one becomes familiar with this website, it takes no more than 10 seconds to click through the questions and find the conclusion one wants. 

[amyelizabethbarrett28_711]

Pretty awesome resource.  Kudos and thanks to your friend.  

[Unknown Member]

Looks like a great start. Agree with Flee, not having to click through a different page for each different lesion attribute would be a positive.

[Dr_Cocciolillo]

There are too many clicks for simple things — Fleishner for lung nodules.  Need a somewhat better layout to be able to get the information quicker.  
For others, it’s much better — pancreatic cysts, laying out both the “suspicious” and “benign” features , but still, there are a good 5-10 clicks to get to the right answer.  that seems too cumbersome for daily practice.  My point is, something with a flowchart, if readily available, would be perhaps easier to get to.  

[jsantamaria_746]

Thanks. I will let him know. But I do not remember seeing the message of 3D either in the ACR white paper for CT or SRU whitepaper for ultrasound. Where do you see it? 

[doctorhassankhaldi_408]

would he consider making this into an app?

[vuonganhhmuk112_783]

Radiologiq app on iOS

[jsantamaria_746]

There is already a great app made by the guys in Cleveland Clinics available in iOS. It is very well designed. It is simply called “Followup”.   
A big reason I like the website layout is it allows me to copy and paste the recommendations into the report directly. Some of the recommendations are really long. For example, the 10 year followup schedule for pancreatic cyst(6 monthsx4, 1 yearx4, 2 yearx2, etc. ) It is hard to dictate that word for word into report without any mistakes. Plus he added the reference info into the recommendation available for copy, it makes the report look more professional and evidence-based. 
Also, many recommendations are based on clinical scenario. For example, the Fleischner ask if the patient is a high risk smoker or not. For private practice, most of the time we just don’t know. My friend wisely added a third category of “unknown risk” in such situation in his website to synthesize both high risk and low risk patients. I found that to be helpful. 
 
 

[arg2626]

For thyroid nodules

http://www.rtsfit.net/TIRADS

[jsantamaria_746]

That is very interesting. It is another well-designed website.  Thanks for sharing. 

[AngPat]

Great stuff