[consuldreugenio]

I always thought it was close to mgma median, just like Cleveland clinic. Thats what I know from rads I know at CCF. The person I know at Mayo is in a different specialty, but compensation set up cant be much different.

The only problem with relatively high compensation employed gigs at CCF and Mayo is much less vacation (~5-6 weeks/yr)

[Unknown Member]

Whats the volume like at these places? If its low and theres academic time then maybe it makes up for the low vacation? If not, yikes.

[mcampbell_392]

Don’t forget: high overall exam complexity, many tumor boards, lots of bureaucratic committees/emails, publishing is a favorable. It needs to be the right fit to work. 

[Unknown Member]

I Imagine for someone who seeks the stimulation and pride of a higher level of clinical practice and subspecialization found in academics, but wants income closer to PP, at the price of less vacation, its a nice option to have.

[Unknown Member]

Mayo is a good place to work.
Most the rads are verifiable experts, because they are clinical rads seeing it all. This is not always true for academicians; as there is a wide spectrum of expertise and pseudoexpertise.
Mayo rads are treated well, and have all the bells and whistles available for research and teaching as desired.

[afk1280_291]

[:)]

[Unknown Member]

Removed due to GDPR request

[Unknown Member]

Quote from CE35B2CBAC728

I’ve heard it’s a great job if you are willing to live in Minnesota. 

Darn tootin’ great job, have to like snow and ice, yah.