[julie.young_645]

Several threads on this already, including this one:
 
[link=https://www.auntminnie.com/Forum/tm.aspx?&m=628676]https://www.auntminnie.com/Forum/tm.aspx?&m=628676[/link]
 
Are you with a hedge fund? Going Short or Long? 😉

[Dr_Cocciolillo]

Let us know your position before you initiate so we can jump on it

[JohnnyFever]

Its probably real, but not like you think.

It probably can obtain an x-ray image of a thin person’s extremities if they don’t move for a long exposure. It might be able to produce a very bad 3D image of a dummy in some cases somewhat resembling but not equivalent to CT.

It won’t be able to do what is promised. It won’t do diagnostic “no touch” mammography. It won’t produce diagnostic quality CT images on real patients. It won’t be fast enough to use intravenous contrast, a cornerstone of medical imaging. It probably won’t be able to get a decent image of the chest or abdomen in a patient with average BMI or who can’t hold their breath. Etc

[ckjj]

It’s smells like THERANOS without Elisabeth Holms !!!!!!

[satyanar]

Quote from zeuses

Hi, I’ve been reading about Nanox technology.   If it’s genuine it appears it’s going to change the radiology landscape.
What do you think?  All opinions are welcome.

[link=https://www.nanox.vision/]https://www.nanox.vision/[/link]

Thanks

 
You are smart to come here and ask if you are interested in the truth. All of the public sources can’t handle it.